Opened 5 years ago

Closed 5 years ago

Last modified 5 years ago

#257 closed bug (fixed)

.Insert method - unable to specify Active listnode

Reported by: Richard Lake Owned by: Thore Böckelmann
Priority: normal Milestone: 4.0-2015R3
Component: Listtree.mcc Version: 4.0-2015R2
Severity: minor Keywords:
Cc: OS Platform: All
Blocked By: Blocking:
Release Notes:


The ability to insert a new element into a listtree structure using the list node of a referenced "Active" special value is either not inplemented or not working. Please can this be fixed ready for a R3 release, thank you.

Further info can be read here:

Change History (7)

comment:1 Changed 5 years ago by Jens Maus

Status: newpending

Please provide an adequate example C-source code here or even better a complete test case which we can use to verify your observations.

comment:2 Changed 5 years ago by Thore Böckelmann

I really must second Jens here. Talking about a crash without providing a crashlog doesn't help anybody.

comment:3 Changed 5 years ago by Thore Böckelmann

Milestone: future release4.0-2015R3
Owner: set to Thore Böckelmann
Priority: undecidednormal
Status: pendingassigned

Handling of MUIV_Listtree_Insert_ListNode_Active in MUIM_Listtree_Insert is missing completely. Instead it is treated as a real node pointer and hence causes the crash. But the Autodoc definitely states this fact:

	    Specify the node which list is used to insert the entry.

	    Special values:

	      The list of the active node. (n/a)

comment:4 Changed 5 years ago by Thore Böckelmann

Resolution: fixed
Status: assignedclosed

In 4954:

  • mcc/Listtree.c: implemented handling of MUIV_Listtree_Insert_ListNode_Active in MUIM_Listtree_Insert. This was yet unimplemented and also documented to be not available and caused crashes if it was used nevertheless. This closes #257.

comment:5 Changed 5 years ago by Thore Böckelmann

Please try again with the next nightly build.

And please provide the crashlog immediately if things are crashing next time. A bug report about a crash without the crashlog is worth nothing.

comment:6 Changed 5 years ago by Richard Lake

Thanks it no longer crashes, however sorry if I wasn't clear in my original ticket but I was hoping that you would actually go ahead and implement this. Would you be able to raise this as a enhancement?

comment:7 in reply to:  6 Changed 5 years ago by Thore Böckelmann

Replying to djrikki:

Would you be able to raise this as a enhancement?

I have no clue what you are expecting from me to do or to change. It was a bug that it was crashing at all. This is fixed now. What kind of enhancement are you expecting now?

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.